← 返回时间线

paper

Generative Late-Interaction Embeddings For Visual Document Retrieval

arXiv ↗
ID
2609.11808
分类
—
首次捕获
2026-09-11
状态
unread
作者
Mohamed Eltahir, Talal Aloushan, Rose Khairoalsendi, Jana Shata, Mohammed Alhassan, Leen Alrehaili, Tanveer Hussain, Naeemullah Khan
信号
SI 53🔥 26

信号历史

  • 2026-09-11Scholar Inbox · 相关分 53
  • 2026-09-11HF Daily Papers · 🔥1
  • 2026-09-12HF Daily Papers · 🔥12
  • 2026-09-13HF Daily Papers · 🔥24
  • 2026-09-14HF Daily Papers · 🔥26

摘要

Late-interaction retrieval is the state-of-the-art for visual document search, but it pays for its accuracy in storage. Existing compression methods retain a subset or local average of the N~1,000 vectors per page. Under aggressive storage budgets, however, these methods degrade sharply, and alternatives require retraining the encoder. Investigating this degradation across three encoders, we found two consistent properties: the vectors lie exactly on the unit sphere and concentrate near a manifold of intrinsic dimension five to six. This geometry yields two insights. First, standard k-means centroids fall inside the sphere, causing systematic underestimation of MaxSim scores. Normalizing them to the surface is a free correction worth up to +0.093 nDCG@5 over raw centroids. Second, because the page manifold has few degrees of freedom, the full set of vectors can be regenerated from only a few. To this end, we introduce Generative Late-Interaction Embeddings (GLIE): k << N vectors per page learned from the normalized centroids to serve as both a lightweight index and a basis for regenerating the page's full embedding set. At query time, search runs exclusively on these k vectors, and a decoder expands only the top candidates back to all N vectors for exact rescoring. At four vectors per page on ViDoRe v1, GLIE retains nearly 80% of the uncompressed system's nDCG@5, against 70% for the best prior post-hoc method. These results use a 415K-parameter network fitted in under three GPU-minutes on just a thousand training pages. At a matched training budget, fine-tuning the encoder does not reach even the training-free stage of GLIE, and the full system beats it at every budget. These patterns hold across a second encoder and ViDoRe v2. By reconstructing evidence on demand rather than sampling it, GLIE opens a new axis for storage-efficient retrieval, with the decoder as its main design surface.

我的笔记

还没有笔记。

在 GitHub 上写笔记 ↗(新建 content/notes/2609.11808.md,PR 合并后本页自动更新)